Common Sense

Every day a child is born into a world of truth and falsehood, good and evil, prosperity and desires. From the first breath, it is conditioned to the action and reaction forces, to understand the relationship between the need and to get, and how to manipulate the circumstances to better serve their needs. Or call now receive milk or take a smile to get a hug, the child soon begins to understand how to acquire tangible material things and not.

Our minds are conditioned to think in terms of acquisitions and possessions. It is in human nature and, as with any other emotion, there is also an emotion attached to his property. The value of a property (whether they are important, such as a house or a car, or intangible, such as professional respect or rich family traditions) is directly related to the effort exerted to. The depth of the effect of this property even directly in front of this effort, as well as their value. The three form an inseparable triad deeply rooted in human nature and the natural law. This simple observation, a fundamental conclusion on the human condition can be summarized as follows:

Your happiness is directly linked to the value of wealth (tangible and intangible) that you created and the effort has helped to do this.

When we learned to play in the sandbox, we say, not toys for other children. Why? Because, first, that toys are not us - we have not earned the right to have them. Secondly, it would be a shame because she'd probably get something to do other children (ie win) would be false. It's just common sense, right?

But some time soon after the sandbox phase in the development of a child these links thriving and deep relationship between objects, effort and luck began to be eaten. In the home, this is done by parents to easily reach the commercial version of the multimedia world accept and unwilling (or unable mentally) to adhere to the fundamental principles of natural law and individual responsibility for their offspring. Apart from the acquisition of the company's home with bizarre representations of the real world, reflected in the attitudes, such as:

Debt is good (and you really do not want to pay anything) Mistakes are a problem for all other Less able does not earn a lower average All efforts are just as good as others and would the same result (ie, the effort that counts) The possibility should not be evenly distributed, but must be biased towards those who are most in need, even (or especially) if at the expense of those who can produce a better result use this opportunity Does that make sense? Is this a company that these principles as effective, fair, just and sustainable? It is clear that the answer is no, because every violation of one or more fundamental laws of human behavior and even common sense. Still, more than most of the 20th century, has embraced American society and processes each of these values ​​in their daily lives, and the government, media and cultural centers are even more different fundamental principles that promote part of DNA behavior part human.

Handy Hit: You also can test your common sense here: Common Sense, Test.

You may also like: Riddle Tests

A modern society based can not impose against nature with laws and regulations on its citizens together on the principles of freedom and liberty. It is, as most people would like to progressive liberals see a place and a time when all guarantees identical results regardless of their individual contribution. It's certainly not one that an irresponsible use of financial and human resources and violate the most fundamental principles of the economics of supply and demand.

If the farmer of the sea, it has the character of the stars and how they navigate the choppy waters escorted by a modern society must also its principles rooted in the proven core. And this is especially true in a world where change is happening increasingly and losing its national compass, threatening society perpetual disorientation in sea conflicts and differences.